Thursday, April 30, 2009

Outsourced Manufacturing Will Have Little Impact on Optical Suppliers' Operating Margins

Courtesy: http://seekingalpha.com/

One of the great debates taking place right now within the optical components industry is whether to outsource production, and move to a fabless model like most logic chip makers. One one side of the argument, Finisar (FNSR) is staying in-house, while rival JDS Uniphase (JDSU) is preparing to send its manufacturing operations to Fabrinet in China.

Advanced Technology vs. Standard Economics

The components industry is littered with penny stocks, and is filled with remarkably intelligent people who can improve the transmission capabilities of fiber optic technologies, but have no idea how to increase operating margins. As a result, all kinds of experiments with different materials and manufacturing processes are taking place now, and the industry is crossing its fingers and hoping something sticks. On one end, silicon photonics vendors like Intel (INTC), Luxtera, and Lightwire are hoping they can match the chip industry's low materials costs, while on the other, JDS Uniphase is hoping it can match the chip industry's low unit manufacturing costs.

The idea to outsource like chip vendors do makes some sense. By concentrating procurement and manufacturing, there should be some savings in material purchases and shipping, not to mention greater leverage with volume purchase arrangements. But outsourcing cannot get rid of onerous VMI (Vendor Managed Inventory) agreements, which force components suppliers to consign inventory at their customer's manufacturing sites, contract or in-house, even when the customer has made no commitment to purchase everything that ships. With inventory cycles that typically last 70-100 days, this forces components vendors to bear most of the risk of unsold and obsolete inventory, and they will need additional mergers to gain more negotiating leverage with big customers like Cisco (CSCO), Alcatel-Lucent (ALU), and Fujitsu.

More important than VMIs though, is the fact that there is no optical equivalent to the dramatically rising lithography and equipment costs seen in the semiconductor industry. With optics, much of the manufacturing cost gets tied up in assembly and testing, which typically means hiring more people, not buying advanced etching machines. This is reflected in the high asset utilization of components vendors. Finisar's Revenue/PP&E of 6 is higher than the 4.6 put up by fabless semi maker Xilinx (XLNX).

Bringing Mundane Inventory Management to Exciting Science

The optical components industry is still having trouble ridding itself of its science fair culture, and this is reflected in the nonsensical argument that outsourcing somehow puts intellectual property at risk. If this were really the case, the entire datacom and semiconductor industries would have been done in by copycats. Nonetheless, it is also poised to resume its revenue growth with the advent of 100 Gigabit transmission, and further advances in DWDM and Fiber-to-the-Home. And with a labor-intensive manufacturing process, outsourcing cannot raise margins to the extent it does in the capital-intensive semiconductor industry. As a result, focusing on the cost effectiveness of what happens before and after manufacturing, including shipping, purchase agreements, and consignment sales, will be just as important as deciding who will be responsible for final assembly.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

4 tasks you fear to outsource but should try

Courtesy: http://www.infoworld.com/

In a sliding market, outsourcing looks increasingly attractive. In this era of drastic cost cutting and budget squeezing, many IT managers facing diminished budgets and frozen in-house resources are exploring ways of sending even more work off site to save money, or at least take capital costs off their immediate plate.

But with traditional outsourcing opportunities all but played out, many enterprises are asking, "Is there anything left to outsource?"

Four critical IT tasks -- project management, e-discovery, regulatory compliance, and environmental activities -- are all ripe for outsourcing. But today, they are generally not outsourced because managers don't think they can send the work off site due to cost, security, and other concerns. It's time to rethink the anxieties in these four areas.

Outsourcing opportunity No. 1: Project management
Project management involves organizing and balancing three basic elements: people, time, and money. Many IT shops would like to unload the nuts and bolts of IT project management onto an outside provider, but worry that the task is simply too big, too complex, and perhaps even too important to outsource.  Managers also fret about losing the precise control and oversight successful project management requires, as well as the ability to turn on a dime if circumstances demand a sudden change in tactics.

Beth Anderson, IT supervisor for Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co., a specialty tobacco and cigarette manufacturer, overcame her reluctance to outsourcing project management after discussing her reservations with SMBology, a firm that handles project management. After some discussions, the partners decided on a staged approach. "We've given them some technical project management responsibility for a couple of major projects," she says. "So it is significant ... but it's not like we've outsourced all project management." A current project aims to add mobility functionality to a Microsoft Dynamics CRM platform.

Regardless of an outsourcing project's scale or scope, Anderson believes that it's vital for the provider to maintain a physical connection with its client. "[SMBology] is physically here to gather requirements and ... when we're doing user testing, so we've got real quick communications," she notes. "If the user sees something that's not working the way they want it to, then the people are here to fix it."

Justin Singer, SMBology's president, says that many IT shops are reluctant to embrace project management outsourcing because they were soured by previous on-site project management experiences. "They may not have experience with what a really good project can look like," he explains. "It's hard for them to really see what the benefits are going to be."

Anderson says outsourcing benefits have generally met her expectations. "You get elastic access to talent, and you get specialized skills that you don't have a need for 365 days a year on your own internal team," she says. "So you can ramp up and stretch the elastic when you need the resources, and then you can snap it back when you no longer need them."

Outsourcing opportunity No. 2: Electronic discovery
Over the years, e-discovery (sifting through data pertaining to criminal or civil legal cases) has grown into a burdensome task for IT shops working inside law firms or enterprises with corporate legal departments. It would be nice if some or all the responsibility for storing and managing theses important documents could be offloaded onto an outside service provider. Yet IT managers often feel that privacy and security issues, as well as user access limitations, make the effective outsourcing of e-discovery material difficult, if not impossible.

But Seth Row, an associate at law firm Holland & Knight, sees it differently. "There are some things I wish we could do more of in-house, but given the current realities, it's not possible," he says. That's why, like a growing number of IT shops in a similar situation, Holland & Knight is outsourcing much of its e-discovery work. "It's good to have options," Row says. "You need to be prepared for lots of different contingencies, so developing relationships with vendors is very important -- it's important that they're there as a resource."

Row notes that a growing number of legal cases focus on e-mail evidence. "E-mail is usually the largest volume of electronic data that you're dealing with in a lawsuit, particularly in an employment-related lawsuit," Row observes. But Row notes that it's virtually impossible to search e-mail effectively in its native client environment. "That doesn't work very well, so it's got to be processed into a database before you can search it across the different fields," he explains. "It's got to get processed so that I can search all the e-mails and all the associated attachments that contain a particular word, or a particular concept."

Although an IT shop could tie up its servers running lengthy databases searches, and then organize and store vast amounts of e-mails and documents, it's often more cost effective to outsource e-discovery projects. Holland & Knight uses the eClaris e-discovery consultancy to handle much of its work. "eClaris has the capability of setting up the database for me, and I would then access it through the Internet," Row says. "So I go to a Web site -- it's password protected -- I log in, and then I can review [the data] through this Web-based system."

While the Web interface addresses IT managers' user access concerns, what about privacy and security issues? Education is the key to calming managers' fears, says Jacques Nack Ngue, eClaris' CEO. "One effort we do is engaging companies, and just providing as much information as possible about the e-discovery process," Nack Ngue says, such as "what the risks are, how to assess them, and how to handle and manage those risks."

Row agrees that once a manager begins working with an outsourcer and understands what needs to be done to maintain security and privacy, the risks suddenly appear much smaller. "It's a collaborative process," he says.

Outsourcing opportunity No. 3: Regulatory compliance
The financial scandals of the late 1990s and early 2000s led to several new federal compliance mandates, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley law. These mandates, as well as an array of other state, local, and industry-based compliance measures such as California's privacy breach notification statute and the payment industry's PCI standard, created new record-keeping, document-tracking, and other demands on IT shops that tend to sap productivity and slow other critical work.

Despite the added IT burden, many enterprises have been reluctant to outsource regulatory compliance tasks, believing that the work is too business-critical to place into the hands of an outsider. Many managers also worry about the security and legal implications of sending such work off-site.

Michael Rasmussen, president of the regulatory compliance advisory Corporate Integrity, says the key to successful outsourcing lies in finding the organization that knows the most about the relevant type of regulatory compliance needs. "There are FDA regulations, different elements of privacy regulations, and disaster recovery and continuity regulations, and each of these requires something different," he says.

Christine Applegate, CFO of East Coast Cable & Communications, a firm that provides installation services for area cable companies, got drawn into the regulatory tangle when Massachusetts enacted a customer privacy law. Not having anyone on staff with the skills or experience needed to ensure that the company was living up to its compliance obligations, she turned to East Coast's primary IT service provider -- Boston-based Vitale Caturano & Co. -- to develop a solution.

Applegate says her initial concerns about handing over regulatory compliance work to an outside entity turned out to be mostly unfounded. By working closely with Vitale Caturano, she could define a strategy that would allow East Coast to comply with the new regulations while safeguarding customer privacy. "We probably would follow the same path if starting over again," she says. "We did not understand the depth of our needs."

Outsourcing opportunity No. 4: Environmental activities
Even as budgets are slashed, many IT shops are feeling increasing pressure to pursue "green" business practices. Outsourcing is a potentially cost-saving way to offload ongoing eco-tasks -- such as environmental audits and hardware disposal -- that lie outside of an IT shop's core competency. Yet many managers are reluctant to pull the trigger on environmental outsourcing, believing that the concept is too amorphous to outsource or because they are skeptical of green issues in general.

Bob Brand has a different view, however. Vice president of corporate security at media giant Cox Enterprises, Brand sees one facet of green outsourcing -- hardware disposal -- as both a potential money-saver and as a way of enhancing IT security.

From Brand's viewpoint, routine hardware disposal risks exposing enterprise secrets to recyclers and other unknown parties. By handing the work over to an outside firm -- Redemtech, in his case -- Brand believes that Cox is relieving IT of a time-consuming task, deriving the maximum value out of its IT hardware assets, and guaranteeing that enterprise data is protected as it enters the recycling process. "With Redemtech we will extend the life of computing equipment while ensuring responsible recycling at the end of life and provide secure treatment of customer and company data, which will measurably contribute to this goal," he says.

"In a widely distributed company, [green] outsourcing offers a straightforward means for centralizing, thus simplifying and controlling fragmented practices that represent real inefficiency and risk," says Robert Houghton, Redemtech's president. "Because environmental and privacy laws are proliferating at the state and local levels, a specialist in the field is often better able to protect a company’s interests in such arcane matters than the organization’s own employees, who may lack the essential in-depth knowledge."

Brand notes that Cox's green outsourcing initiative didn't come without effort. "It took us about six months to develop our strategy," he says. "Progress is going well. However, it could be several years before we're able to fully implement our plans across our operating businesses, which are largely decentralized and include nearly 78,000 employees worldwide."

Yet Brand believes that his company made the right decision. "The icing on the cake is realizing the return on your investment that leads to environmental and economic sustainability," he says.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Leo Burnett to outsource from India

Courtesy: http://www.business-standard.com/

Hit by the global economic slump, Leo Burnett one of the world’s largest advertising agencies, is planning to make India a global outsourcing hub, as clients look at cutting costs.

On a week’s visit to India to plan for business in 2009 and also to attend the wedding of India chairman Arvind Sharma’s daughter, Tom Bernardin, chairman and chief executive officer, Leo Burnett Worldwide, announced changes in its global leadership council for a tighter integration of Asia Pacific with the Chicago headquarters.

Asia-Pacific (APAC) President Michelle Kristula-Green has been promoted to become global human resources head based at its headquarters. Regional President Jarek Zubinski will take the post vacated by Kristula-Green and Arvind Sharma will become a part of the leadership council team to represent India. “We want India and the Asia Pacific region to be very close to us and to have a tighter integration,” Bernardin told.

Document outsourcing 'surging'

Courtesy: http://www.bcs.org/

Outsourcing of strategic documents is becoming more popular as companies look to reduce expenses and costs during the economic downturn.

That's according to industry analyst firm Gartner, which said that any outsourcing of print and online documents should be done in a manner that does not compromise quality or confidentiality.

'Strategic document outsourcing offers organizations the opportunity to eliminate print and mail-related capital expenditures while potentially reducing material and postage expenses," observed Pete Basiliere, research director at Gartner.

'Outsource providers facilitate the targeted, relevant customer communications that can not only retain and grow the client base but also increase revenue.'

Gartner added that outsourcing shifts the costs of labour and material to providers, which is advantageous to businesses, but firms may not always realize benefits.

This is because 'highly customized solutions' could in fact increase the costs of production and not deliver money-saving gains to companies.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Rules Change in the Mobile Handset Outsourcing Business

Courtesy: http://www.cellular-news.com/

With the structure of the mobile handset supply chain upended by the global economic crisis, the old rules for the contract manufacturing of wireless devices have been overturned, leaving new pitfalls for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) providers, according to iSuppli Corp.

One major rule change is that the contract manufacturing business can no longer count on incremental growth in outsourced production from all wireless OEMs.

“Until recently, the contract manufacturing industry yielded consistent double-digit year-over-year growth rates in mobile handset outsourcing,” said Jeffrey Wu, senior analyst, EMS/ODM for iSuppli. “However, the uncertainty in the marketplace now is forcing some OEMs to not only decelerate outsourcing but also to reclaim production by moving it in-house. Nokia, for instance, is one such OEM.”

Nokia in 2008 decreased the percentage of its outsourced manufacturing volume to 17.1 percent, down from 21.5 percent in 2007. The attached figure presents the balance of in-house and outsourced manufacturing at Nokia from 2005 to 2008.

“This reflects a larger trend in the mobile-handset supply chain,” Wu said. “Decelerating and decreasing outsourced manufacturing by those OEMs that are still operationally competent will hurt the growth prospects of contract manufacturers.”

Thus, as EMS and ODM providers mull their future strategies, they should not fall into the trap of assuming continued strong growth in production outsourcing among mobile-handset OEMs.

Vertical structure goes flat

Looking at another potential pitfall, the success of Foxconn International Holdings (FIH) in recent years has spurred other EMS firms to emulate the company’s vertical supply chain structure, including component procurement. FIH’s extensive integration of various nodes of the supply chain into its operations often was credited as a key contributor to the company’s success and its rise to the leading position in the global EMS market. However, the halo surrounding FIH disappeared in 2008 and was replaced by a series of disappointing financial announcements.

“When the economy is going strong and market demand is vibrant, the vertically integrated model can help an EMS provider grow because the economies of scale can be leveraged internally, and the manufacturing business and the component business can subsidize each other,” Wu said. “But when the order volume drops, this model doesn’t allow a lot of flexibility for the manufacturing arm and prevents it from sourcing to external component suppliers easily. Thus, the vertical integration model is like a double-edged sword, helping an EMS provider to compete better when the market grows, but making it suffer more when the economy stagnates.”

Because of this, iSuppli concludes that EMS firms may want to avoid the hazard of adopting FIH’s vertical structure amid the market downturn.

Getting results from outsourcing

Courtesy: http://www.itp.net/

Outsourcing is the reassignment of the management and/or daily implementation of an entire business function, which may otherwise be conducted internally, to an external service provider. The outsourcer - generally a client company - and the supplier of the outsourced service and/or product enter into an agreement that clearly sets out the services and/or products that are to be outsourced.

Outsourcing agreements are often compared to service level agreements (SLAs) and share a number of similarities. However the main variation that exists is the level of continued support of the service and/or product and the extent of the management control. Consequently, an outsourcing agreement will often contain provisions found in SLAs.

Any well-prepared outsourcing agreement that protects all aspects adequately should consider:

Commencement/Transition Phase

This initial phase includes issues related to the transfer of personnel and ownership concerns of the software and hardware, if any, that are to be an aspect of the services and/or products.

The primary considered aspect is that of the employees. The UAE governs employees through Federal Law No. (8) of 1980 concerning the Labour Law, which states that the primary employer, that is to say the company named on the employee's visa, remains liable for their actions and their remuneration.

Furthermore, UAE Federal Law No. (5) of 1985 concerning the Civil Transactions Law provides under Article 907 that, "The worker may not engage himself in any other activity during working time no shall he work during the period of the contract for another employer."

When outsourcing,  there are two available options for employees. The first includes the cancellation/transfer of the service provider's employee's current visa and its re-issuance to the ‘sponsorship' of the client company, thereby maintaining conformity with the Labour Law by ensuring that employees working at a particular company's premises are sponsored by the client company.

The second option would stipulate which party is liable for the obligations and responsibilities pertaining to the employee's actions and remunerations. Although seemingly convenient, these terms must clearly mention that employees remain the service provider's responsibility and any actions taken against them may only be done through the employee's sponsor.

Management/Operation Phase

Both parties should make certain that the services/products are being managed effectively. This will refer to issues related to the obligations of the parties, financing, insurance coverage and third party licences with reference to intellectual property. Topics such as third-party software can create problems for the client company. It should be noted that licences issued to customers often exclude assignment rights -and this can become a crucial issue.

The choice of implementing software or third party instruments should be made early. If introduced by the outsourcing supplier, then the issue of continuing with the use of such software can be a problem. If left entirely in the hands of the supplier, then upon termination of the agreement it is perfectly possible for them to withdraw the ability to use the third party rights from the company, effectively leaving the outsourced service and/or product virtually helpless.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Outsourcing by another name?

We have all read about the outsourcing trend that is costing jobs to blue collar workers in the US and Europe. However how many of us have cared to voice our disapproval against the kind of outsourcing that is costing thousands of farmers, the poorest of the poor in India, their lives because of huge US farm subsidies on pesticides exported to developing countries that instead of killing bugs ends up as poison in the hands of the debt-ridden farmers.

Log on to award winning journalist P. Sainath’s India Together series for shocking details of the kind of “agrarian emergency” that Prof. K. Nagaraj of the Madras Institute of Development Studies calls, “a predatory commercialization of the countryside,” courtesy the MNC lobby that supplies crop pesticides to farmers in developing economies.

One disgruntled reader of Sainath’s column blames this “suicide epidemic” in India that presently infects the whole of the once green Vidharba belt in Gujarat on the US on the “patents regime that has totally rigged the international trading system again the small and marginal farmers in poor countries,” the commentator minces no words in saying, “the poverty that Mexico and other countries are exporting to US is the poverty that US has created in those countries in first place through its need-of-the-hour fiscal and monetary policies.”

This reader’s point, as he later explains is simple. That the real or imagined advantage that H1B program is giving workers from another country is infinitesimal smaller than the advantage that the US consumer indirectly forces out from other countries, especially third world countries largely because of the policies followed by Western businesses in these countries. Getting an understanding of such double standards in conducting clinical trials outsourcing in developing countries where legislation governing these trials is weak is equally critical.

Courtesy: http://outsourceportfolio.com/